head to head · open source
Trigger vs lazycodex
Trigger has 16,706 GitHub stars, 1,522 forks, 342 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. lazycodex has 3,870 stars, 250 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Trigger leads on adoption by 332% (16,706 vs 3,870 stars). Trigger is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; lazycodex is written in TypeScript under MIT. Trigger has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, lazycodex 6%. lazycodex was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai, ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Trigger | lazycodex | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 17K | ★ 3.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.5K | ⑂ 250 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Trigger if
- You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick lazycodex if
- You want the lazycodex feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and lazycodex fits your workflow better
About Trigger
Build and deploy fully‑managed AI agents and workflows Website Docs Issues Example projects Feature requests Public roadmap Self hosting About Trigger.dev Trigger.dev is the open source platform for building AI workflows in TypeScript. Long running tasks with retries, queues, observability, and elastic scaling. The platform designed for building AI agents Build AI agents using all the frameworks, services and LLMs you're used to, deploy them to Trigger.dev and get durable, long running tasks with retries, queues, observability, and elastic scaling out of the box. Long running without timeouts : Execute your…
read the full Trigger overview →
About lazycodex
LazyCodex The one and only agent harness for complex codebases. Project memory, planning, execution, and verified completion inside Codex. What is this? · OmO · lazycodex.ai [!NOTE] [OmO] 60K Stars: the terrifying token burner has arrived in LazyCodex. Sisyphus Labs' OmO is the quality obsessed agent harness whose public lore says it loved Anthropic models hard enough to get third party clients blocked. Now that same OmO quality bar is available for Codex through LazyCodex. If you wanted OmO but did not want the setup ceremony, start here: Context: OmO 60K Stars on X 🚀 Install One line. No global install, no…
read the full lazycodex overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Trigger or lazycodex more popular?
Trigger has 16,706 GitHub stars and lazycodex has 3,870. Trigger has the larger community by that measure.
Are Trigger and lazycodex free?
Both are open source. Trigger is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lazycodex under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Trigger and lazycodex?
Trigger is written in TypeScript and lazycodex in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Trigger or lazycodex?
Choose Trigger if you want the larger community (16,706 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose lazycodex if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.