head to head · open source

Trigger vs jido

Trigger has 16,345 GitHub stars, 1,464 forks, 342 open issues and last shipped today. jido has 1,860 stars, 119 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Trigger leads on adoption by 779% (16,345 vs 1,860 stars). Trigger is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; jido is written in Elixir under Apache-2.0. Trigger has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, jido 6%. Trigger was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, orchestration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Trigger ★ 16K jido ★ 1.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Trigger jido
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 1.9K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Elixir
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 119
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Trigger if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Trigger profile →

pick jido if

  • You want the jido feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Elixir
  • You evaluated both and jido fits your workflow better

full jido profile →

About Trigger

Trigger is an open source TypeScript platform for building and deploying AI agents and workflow tasks. It lives in the infrastructure, orchestration, and scheduling ecosystem, and it is positioned as a way to run long running AI tasks without typical serverless timeout constraints. The project provides a software development kit, a deployment target, and operational features such as retries, queues, observability, and elastic scaling.

read the full Trigger overview →

About jido

Jido is an open source autonomous agent framework for Elixir, aimed at developers building multi agent systems and dynamic workflows who want to stay inside ordinary Elixir and OTP software rather than adopt a separate agent runtime.

read the full jido overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Trigger vs ansible Trigger vs compose Trigger vs conductor Trigger vs xxl-job Trigger vs gitleaks Trigger vs Kestra Trigger vs haystack Trigger vs rancher Trigger vs Prefect Trigger vs Archon Trigger vs Temporal Trigger vs rowboat

Frequently asked questions

Is Trigger or jido more popular?

Trigger has 16,345 GitHub stars and jido has 1,860. Trigger has the larger community by that measure.

Are Trigger and jido free?

Both are open source. Trigger is licensed under Apache-2.0 and jido under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Trigger and jido?

Trigger is written in TypeScript and jido in Elixir. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Trigger or jido?

Choose Trigger if you want the larger community (16,345 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose jido if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.