head to head · open source
tradememory-protocol vs chainloop
tradememory-protocol has 1,437 GitHub stars, 170 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. chainloop has 610 stars, 64 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tradememory-protocol leads on adoption by 136% (1,437 vs 610 stars). tradememory-protocol is written in Python under MIT; chainloop is written in Go under Apache-2.0. tradememory-protocol has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, chainloop 10%. chainloop was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, compliance), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| tradememory-protocol | chainloop | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 1.4K | ★ 610 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-23 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 170 | ⑂ 64 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick tradememory-protocol if
- You weight community size — 1.4K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chainloop if
- You want the chainloop feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and chainloop fits your workflow better
About tradememory-protocol
Getting Started Use Cases API Reference OWM Framework Limitations 中文版 Project status (August 2026): Feature complete, in maintenance mode — bug and security reports are still reviewed; no new features or hosted service are planned. For paid work, see Trading Record Analysis. Your trading AI has amnesia. And regulators are starting to notice. It makes the same mistakes every session. It can't explain why it traded. It forgets everything when the context window ends. Meanwhile, MiFID II is raising the bar for algorithmic decision documentation (Article 17). The EU AI Act demands systematic logging of AI actions…
read the full tradememory-protocol overview →
About chainloop
Chainloop What is it? Chainloop is an open source evidence store for your Software Supply Chain attestations, Software Bill of Materials (SBOMs), VEX, SARIF, QA reports, and more. With Chainloop, Security, Compliance, and Risk management teams can define security and compliance policies, what evidence and artifacts they want to receive, and where to store them. On the other hand, developers are shielded from all this complexity by being given simple instructions on what to provide when instrumenting their CI/CD pipelines. To learn more about the project motivation please look at our documentation. How does it…
read the full chainloop overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is tradememory-protocol or chainloop more popular?
tradememory-protocol has 1,437 GitHub stars and chainloop has 610. tradememory-protocol has the larger community by that measure.
Are tradememory-protocol and chainloop free?
Both are open source. tradememory-protocol is licensed under MIT and chainloop under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between tradememory-protocol and chainloop?
tradememory-protocol is written in Python and chainloop in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, tradememory-protocol or chainloop?
Choose tradememory-protocol if you want the larger community (1,437 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose chainloop if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.