head to head · open source

Tone.js vs liubai

Tone.js has 14,725 GitHub stars, 1,063 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. liubai has 864 stars, 87 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Tone.js leads on adoption by 1,604% (14,725 vs 864 stars). Tone.js is written in TypeScript under MIT; liubai is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Tone.js has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, liubai 10%. Tone.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (scheduling), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Tone.js ★ 15K liubai ★ 864 category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Tone.js liubai
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 864
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-07-02
Forks ⑂ 1.1K ⑂ 87
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Tone.js if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Tone.js profile →

pick liubai if

  • You want the liubai feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and liubai fits your workflow better

full liubai profile →

About Tone.js

Tone.js is a Web Audio framework for creating interactive music in the browser. It is written in TypeScript and released under the MIT license, and it lives in the JavaScript and Web Audio API ecosystem, where it is distributed through npm and unpkg. The project has been developed for roughly thirteen years and carries a substantial community footprint, with more than fourteen thousand stars and over a thousand forks on GitHub.

read the full Tone.js overview →

About liubai

Liubai is an AGPL 3.0, local first application for notes, schedules, to do lists and tasks with built in AI, written in TypeScript and aimed at individuals and small teams who want to plan their day and collaborate through WeChat without handing their data to a closed service.

read the full liubai overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

cal-com vs tone-js cal-com vs luigi cal-com vs salt cal-com vs apscheduler cal-com vs rallly cal-com vs easy-appointments cal-com vs hi-events cal-com vs croner plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Scheduling & Event Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Scheduling & Event Management field.

Tone.js vs Cal.com Tone.js vs luigi Tone.js vs salt Tone.js vs apscheduler Tone.js vs Rallly Tone.js vs Easy!Appointments Tone.js vs Hi.Events Tone.js vs croner Tone.js vs brightbean-studio Tone.js vs Saturn Tone.js vs nexrender Tone.js vs laravel-totem

Frequently asked questions

Is Tone.js or liubai more popular?

Tone.js has 14,725 GitHub stars and liubai has 864. Tone.js has the larger community by that measure.

Are Tone.js and liubai free?

Both are open source. Tone.js is licensed under MIT and liubai under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Tone.js and liubai?

Tone.js is written in TypeScript and liubai in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Tone.js or liubai?

Choose Tone.js if you want the larger community (14,725 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose liubai if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.