head to head · open source
teleport vs Harden-Windows-Security
teleport has 21,061 GitHub stars, 2,181 forks, 3,262 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. Harden-Windows-Security has 4,825 stars, 345 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. teleport leads on adoption by 336% (21,061 vs 4,825 stars). teleport is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; Harden-Windows-Security is written in C# under MIT. teleport has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Harden-Windows-Security 7%. Harden-Windows-Security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (audit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| teleport | Harden-Windows-Security | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 4.8K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | C# |
| Last push | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 345 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick teleport if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Harden-Windows-Security if
- You want the Harden-Windows-Security feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and Harden-Windows-Security fits your workflow better
About teleport
Teleport provides connectivity, authentication, access controls and audit for infrastructure. You might use Teleport to: Set up single sign on (SSO) for all of your cloud and on prem infrastructure. Protect access to servers, Kubernetes clusters, databases, Windows desktops, web applications, and cloud APIs without long lived keys or passwords. Establish secure tunnels to reach resources behind NATs and firewalls without VPNs or bastion hosts. Record and audit activity across SSH, Kubernetes, database, RDP, and web sessions. Apply consistent Role Based and Attribute Based Access Control (RBAC/ABAC) across users…
read the full teleport overview →
About Harden-Windows-Security
Harden Windows Security A New Threat to Malware Harden Windows Safely, Securely, Only With Official Microsoft Methods How To Use Related Trust Support Security Recommendations Resources License Wiki Basic FAQs Roadmap Donation [!IMPORTANT]\ Here are Quick Access Points to Important Sections of this Repository Harden System Security App AppControl Manager App Application Control for Business Resources [!NOTE]\ This repository only uses the features that have already been implemented by Microsoft in Windows OS to fine tune it towards the highest security and locked down state, without relying on any 3rd party…
read the full Harden-Windows-Security overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is teleport or Harden-Windows-Security more popular?
teleport has 21,061 GitHub stars and Harden-Windows-Security has 4,825. teleport has the larger community by that measure.
Are teleport and Harden-Windows-Security free?
Both are open source. teleport is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Harden-Windows-Security under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between teleport and Harden-Windows-Security?
teleport is written in Go and Harden-Windows-Security in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, teleport or Harden-Windows-Security?
Choose teleport if you want the larger community (21,061 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Harden-Windows-Security if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.