head to head · open source

teleport vs aircrack-ng

teleport has 20,924 GitHub stars, 2,158 forks, 3,262 open issues and last shipped yesterday. aircrack-ng has 7,654 stars, 1,375 forks, 462 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. teleport leads on adoption by 173% (20,924 vs 7,654 stars). teleport is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; aircrack-ng is written in C under GPL-2.0. teleport has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, aircrack-ng 18%. teleport was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (audit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

teleport ★ 21K aircrack-ng ★ 7.7K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

teleport aircrack-ng
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 7.7K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick teleport if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full teleport profile →

pick aircrack-ng if

  • You want the aircrack-ng feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and aircrack-ng fits your workflow better

full aircrack-ng profile →

About teleport

Teleport is an open source, identity aware access plane that provides connectivity, authentication, access control, and audit for servers, Kubernetes clusters, databases, Windows desktops, web applications, and cloud APIs, and it is aimed at platform, security, and infrastructure teams that need to protect access to that infrastructure.

read the full teleport overview →

About aircrack-ng

Aircrack ng is a GPL 2.0 licensed suite of WiFi security auditing tools written in C, intended for network auditors, penetration testers, and compliance and risk management teams who assess wireless networks on hardware they control.

read the full aircrack-ng overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs kyverno plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

teleport vs lighthouse teleport vs lynis teleport vs prowler teleport vs gs-quant teleport vs opa teleport vs Amphion teleport vs checkov teleport vs kyverno teleport vs tfsec teleport vs rundeck teleport vs agent-governance-toolkit teleport vs laravel-activitylog

Frequently asked questions

Is teleport or aircrack-ng more popular?

teleport has 20,924 GitHub stars and aircrack-ng has 7,654. teleport has the larger community by that measure.

Are teleport and aircrack-ng free?

Both are open source. teleport is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and aircrack-ng under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between teleport and aircrack-ng?

teleport is written in Go and aircrack-ng in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, teleport or aircrack-ng?

Choose teleport if you want the larger community (20,924 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose aircrack-ng if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.