head to head · open source
teleport vs aircrack-ng
teleport has 21,061 GitHub stars, 2,181 forks, 3,262 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. aircrack-ng has 7,850 stars, 1,402 forks, 462 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. teleport leads on adoption by 168% (21,061 vs 7,850 stars). teleport is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; aircrack-ng is written in C under GPL-2.0. teleport has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, aircrack-ng 18%. teleport was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (audit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| teleport | aircrack-ng | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 7.8K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | C |
| Last push | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-09 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 1.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick teleport if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick aircrack-ng if
- You want the aircrack-ng feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You evaluated both and aircrack-ng fits your workflow better
About teleport
Teleport provides connectivity, authentication, access controls and audit for infrastructure. You might use Teleport to: Set up single sign on (SSO) for all of your cloud and on prem infrastructure. Protect access to servers, Kubernetes clusters, databases, Windows desktops, web applications, and cloud APIs without long lived keys or passwords. Establish secure tunnels to reach resources behind NATs and firewalls without VPNs or bastion hosts. Record and audit activity across SSH, Kubernetes, database, RDP, and web sessions. Apply consistent Role Based and Attribute Based Access Control (RBAC/ABAC) across users…
read the full teleport overview →
About aircrack-ng
Aircrack ng Badges GitHub CI Others Repository versions Description Aircrack ng is a complete suite of tools to assess WiFi network security. It focuses on different areas of WiFi security: Monitoring: Packet capture and export of data to text files for further processing by third party tools. Attacking: Replay attacks, deauthentication, fake access points and others via packet injection. Testing: Checking WiFi cards and driver capabilities (capture and injection). Cracking: WEP and WPA PSK (WPA 1 and 2). All tools are command line which allows for heavy scripting. A lot of GUIs have taken advantage of this…
read the full aircrack-ng overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is teleport or aircrack-ng more popular?
teleport has 21,061 GitHub stars and aircrack-ng has 7,850. teleport has the larger community by that measure.
Are teleport and aircrack-ng free?
Both are open source. teleport is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and aircrack-ng under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between teleport and aircrack-ng?
teleport is written in Go and aircrack-ng in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, teleport or aircrack-ng?
Choose teleport if you want the larger community (21,061 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose aircrack-ng if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.