head to head · open source

teleport vs copacetic

teleport has 20,924 GitHub stars, 2,158 forks, 3,262 open issues and last shipped yesterday. copacetic has 1,708 stars, 124 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. teleport leads on adoption by 1,125% (20,924 vs 1,708 stars). teleport is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; copacetic is written in Go under Apache-2.0. teleport has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, copacetic 7%. teleport was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

teleport ★ 21K copacetic ★ 1.7K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

teleport copacetic
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 1.7K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 124
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick teleport if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full teleport profile →

pick copacetic if

  • You want the copacetic feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and copacetic fits your workflow better

full copacetic profile →

About teleport

Teleport is an open source, identity aware access plane that provides connectivity, authentication, access control, and audit for servers, Kubernetes clusters, databases, Windows desktops, web applications, and cloud APIs, and it is aimed at platform, security, and infrastructure teams that need to protect access to that infrastructure.

read the full teleport overview →

About copacetic

Copa is a CLI tool written in Go and based on buildkit that directly patches container images without a full rebuild. It lives in the container security and DevSecOps ecosystem, where it works with Docker images and vulnerability scan reports from tools such as Trivy.

read the full copacetic overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs kyverno plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

teleport vs lighthouse teleport vs lynis teleport vs prowler teleport vs gs-quant teleport vs opa teleport vs Amphion teleport vs checkov teleport vs kyverno teleport vs aircrack-ng teleport vs tfsec teleport vs rundeck teleport vs agent-governance-toolkit

Frequently asked questions

Is teleport or copacetic more popular?

teleport has 20,924 GitHub stars and copacetic has 1,708. teleport has the larger community by that measure.

Are teleport and copacetic free?

Both are open source. teleport is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and copacetic under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between teleport and copacetic?

teleport is written in Go and copacetic in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, teleport or copacetic?

Choose teleport if you want the larger community (20,924 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose copacetic if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.