head to head · open source

telegraf vs thanos

telegraf has 17,807 GitHub stars, 5,839 forks, 449 open issues and last shipped yesterday. thanos has 14,207 stars, 2,369 forks, 908 open issues and last shipped yesterday. telegraf leads on adoption by 25% (17,807 vs 14,207 stars). telegraf is written in Go under MIT; thanos is written in Go under Apache-2.0. telegraf has attracted 33% as many forks as stars, thanos 17%. telegraf was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (hacktoberfest, metrics, monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

telegraf ★ 18K thanos ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

telegraf thanos
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 14K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 2.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick telegraf if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full telegraf profile →

pick thanos if

  • You want the thanos feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and thanos fits your workflow better

full thanos profile →

About telegraf

Telegraf is a Go based, MIT licensed open source agent that collects, processes, aggregates, and writes metrics, logs, and other arbitrary data, and it is aimed at engineers who run their own monitoring and observability pipelines.

read the full telegraf overview →

About thanos

Thanos is a CNCF Incubating, Apache 2.0 licensed collection of Go components that composes a highly available metric system with unlimited storage capacity on top of an existing Prometheus deployment.

read the full thanos overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

telegraf vs Uptime Kuma telegraf vs worldmonitor telegraf vs NetData telegraf vs Grafana telegraf vs huginn telegraf vs Sentry telegraf vs SigNoz telegraf vs Grafana Loki telegraf vs beszel telegraf vs cilium telegraf vs Apache SkyWalking telegraf vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is telegraf or thanos more popular?

telegraf has 17,807 GitHub stars and thanos has 14,207. telegraf has the larger community by that measure.

Are telegraf and thanos free?

Both are open source. telegraf is licensed under MIT and thanos under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between telegraf and thanos?

telegraf is written in Go and thanos in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, telegraf or thanos?

Choose telegraf if you want the larger community (17,807 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose thanos if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.