head to head · open source

telegraf vs OpenReplay

telegraf has 17,807 GitHub stars, 5,839 forks, 449 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenReplay has 12,880 stars, 844 forks, 180 open issues and last shipped yesterday. telegraf leads on adoption by 38% (17,807 vs 12,880 stars). telegraf is written in Go under MIT; OpenReplay is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. telegraf has attracted 33% as many forks as stars, OpenReplay 7%. telegraf was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

telegraf ★ 18K OpenReplay ★ 13K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

telegraf OpenReplay
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 13K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 844
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick telegraf if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full telegraf profile →

pick OpenReplay if

  • You want the OpenReplay feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and OpenReplay fits your workflow better

full OpenReplay profile →

About telegraf

Telegraf is a Go based, MIT licensed open source agent that collects, processes, aggregates, and writes metrics, logs, and other arbitrary data, and it is aimed at engineers who run their own monitoring and observability pipelines.

read the full telegraf overview →

About OpenReplay

OpenReplay is open source session replay suite. It lives in JavaScript web app monitoring and observability ecosystem. It supports session replay, cobrowsing, product analytics. TypeScript project. GitHub category is Infrastructure & Operations / Monitoring & Observability. Topics include analytics, angular, devtools, feature flags, ios, javascript, nextjs, product analytics, react, react native, real user monitoring, session replay.

read the full OpenReplay overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

telegraf vs Uptime Kuma telegraf vs worldmonitor telegraf vs NetData telegraf vs Grafana telegraf vs huginn telegraf vs Sentry telegraf vs SigNoz telegraf vs Grafana Loki telegraf vs beszel telegraf vs cilium telegraf vs Apache SkyWalking telegraf vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is telegraf or OpenReplay more popular?

telegraf has 17,807 GitHub stars and OpenReplay has 12,880. telegraf has the larger community by that measure.

Are telegraf and OpenReplay free?

Both are open source. telegraf is licensed under MIT, and OpenReplay has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between telegraf and OpenReplay?

telegraf is written in Go and OpenReplay in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, telegraf or OpenReplay?

Choose telegraf if you want the larger community (17,807 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenReplay if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.