head to head · open source

telegraf vs kubeshark

telegraf has 17,807 GitHub stars, 5,839 forks, 449 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kubeshark has 12,082 stars, 549 forks, 149 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. telegraf leads on adoption by 47% (17,807 vs 12,082 stars). telegraf is written in Go under MIT; kubeshark is written in Go under Apache-2.0. telegraf has attracted 33% as many forks as stars, kubeshark 5%. telegraf was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

telegraf ★ 18K kubeshark ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

telegraf kubeshark
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 12K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 549
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick telegraf if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full telegraf profile →

pick kubeshark if

  • You want the kubeshark feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and kubeshark fits your workflow better

full kubeshark profile →

About telegraf

Telegraf is a Go based, MIT licensed open source agent that collects, processes, aggregates, and writes metrics, logs, and other arbitrary data, and it is aimed at engineers who run their own monitoring and observability pipelines.

read the full telegraf overview →

About kubeshark

Kubeshark is an Apache 2.0, eBPF powered network observability tool for Kubernetes that indexes cluster wide L4/L7 traffic with full Kubernetes context and makes that traffic queryable by AI agents through the Model Context Protocol and by humans through a real time dashboard.

read the full kubeshark overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

telegraf vs Uptime Kuma telegraf vs worldmonitor telegraf vs NetData telegraf vs Grafana telegraf vs huginn telegraf vs Sentry telegraf vs SigNoz telegraf vs Grafana Loki telegraf vs beszel telegraf vs cilium telegraf vs Apache SkyWalking telegraf vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is telegraf or kubeshark more popular?

telegraf has 17,807 GitHub stars and kubeshark has 12,082. telegraf has the larger community by that measure.

Are telegraf and kubeshark free?

Both are open source. telegraf is licensed under MIT and kubeshark under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between telegraf and kubeshark?

telegraf is written in Go and kubeshark in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, telegraf or kubeshark?

Choose telegraf if you want the larger community (17,807 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kubeshark if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.