head to head · open source

telegraf vs gf

telegraf has 17,807 GitHub stars, 5,839 forks, 449 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gf has 13,272 stars, 1,719 forks, 148 open issues and last shipped yesterday. telegraf leads on adoption by 34% (17,807 vs 13,272 stars). telegraf is written in Go under MIT; gf is written in Go under MIT. telegraf has attracted 33% as many forks as stars, gf 13%. telegraf was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

telegraf ★ 18K gf ★ 13K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

telegraf gf
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 13K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick telegraf if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full telegraf profile →

pick gf if

  • You want the gf feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and gf fits your workflow better

full gf profile →

About telegraf

Telegraf is a Go based, MIT licensed open source agent that collects, processes, aggregates, and writes metrics, logs, and other arbitrary data, and it is aimed at engineers who run their own monitoring and observability pipelines.

read the full telegraf overview →

About gf

GoFrame is an MIT licensed, production ready application framework for the Go programming language that provides a full stack toolkit — HTTP server, ORM, logging, tracing, and command line scaffolding — in a single dependency, aimed at Go teams that want one coherent framework instead of assembling many separate libraries.

read the full gf overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

telegraf vs Uptime Kuma telegraf vs worldmonitor telegraf vs NetData telegraf vs Grafana telegraf vs huginn telegraf vs Sentry telegraf vs SigNoz telegraf vs Grafana Loki telegraf vs beszel telegraf vs cilium telegraf vs Apache SkyWalking telegraf vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is telegraf or gf more popular?

telegraf has 17,807 GitHub stars and gf has 13,272. telegraf has the larger community by that measure.

Are telegraf and gf free?

Both are open source. telegraf is licensed under MIT and gf under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between telegraf and gf?

telegraf is written in Go and gf in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, telegraf or gf?

Choose telegraf if you want the larger community (17,807 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gf if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.