head to head · open source
aircrack-ng vs TeamPass
aircrack-ng has 7,823 GitHub stars, 1,398 forks, 462 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. TeamPass has 1,870 stars, 571 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. aircrack-ng leads on adoption by 318% (7,823 vs 1,870 stars). aircrack-ng is written in C under GPL-2.0; TeamPass is written in PHP under GPL-3.0. aircrack-ng has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, TeamPass 31%. TeamPass was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (audit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| aircrack-ng | TeamPass | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.8K | ★ 1.9K |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-10-09 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 571 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick aircrack-ng if
- You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick TeamPass if
- You want the TeamPass feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and TeamPass fits your workflow better
About aircrack-ng
Aircrack ng Badges GitHub CI Others Repository versions Description Aircrack ng is a complete suite of tools to assess WiFi network security. It focuses on different areas of WiFi security: Monitoring: Packet capture and export of data to text files for further processing by third party tools. Attacking: Replay attacks, deauthentication, fake access points and others via packet injection. Testing: Checking WiFi cards and driver capabilities (capture and injection). Cracking: WEP and WPA PSK (WPA 1 and 2). All tools are command line which allows for heavy scripting. A lot of GUIs have taken advantage of this…
read the full aircrack-ng overview →
About TeamPass
Teampass Self hosted password management your whole team can trust Folder level access control · authenticated AES 256 GCM encryption · compliance evidence Your secrets never leave your infrastructure. 🌐 teampass.net · 📖 Documentation · 💬 Discussions · 🐳 Docker Hub Contents About Who it's for Security Features Get started Documentation Languages Community Support Teampass License About Teampass is an open source credential vault you run yourself. No account to create, no company behind the curtain holding your data — just a PHP/MySQL application on your own server, with folder level access control, per user…
read the full TeamPass overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is aircrack-ng or TeamPass more popular?
aircrack-ng has 7,823 GitHub stars and TeamPass has 1,870. aircrack-ng has the larger community by that measure.
Are aircrack-ng and TeamPass free?
Both are open source. aircrack-ng is licensed under GPL-2.0 and TeamPass under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between aircrack-ng and TeamPass?
aircrack-ng is written in C and TeamPass in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, aircrack-ng or TeamPass?
Choose aircrack-ng if you want the larger community (7,823 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose TeamPass if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.