head to head · open source
syncthing vs r2-web
syncthing has 90,252 GitHub stars, 5,584 forks, 388 open issues and last shipped yesterday. r2-web has 500 stars, 103 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. syncthing leads on adoption by 17,950% (90,252 vs 500 stars). syncthing is written in Go under MPL-2.0; r2-web is written in JavaScript under MIT. syncthing has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, r2-web 21%. syncthing was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| syncthing | r2-web | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 500 |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-09 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.6K | ⑂ 103 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick syncthing if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick r2-web if
- You want the r2-web feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and r2-web fits your workflow better
About syncthing
[![Syncthing][14]][15] Goals Syncthing is a continuous file synchronization program . It synchronizes files between two or more computers. We strive to fulfill the goals below. The goals are listed in order of importance, the most important ones first. This is the summary version of the goal list for more commentary, see the full [Goals document][13]. Syncthing should be: 1. Safe From Data Loss Protecting the user's data is paramount. We take every reasonable precaution to avoid corrupting the user's files. 2. Secure Against Attackers Again, protecting the user's data is paramount. Regardless of our other goals…
read the full syncthing overview →
About r2-web
中文 English R2 Web 📁 轻盈优雅的 Web 原生 Cloudflare R2 文件管理器，一切皆在浏览器中完成。 本项目曾被 [《科技爱好者周刊（第 387 期）》][ruanyifeng weekly] 和 [《HelloGitHub（第 123 期）》][hellogithub 123] 推荐。 在线使用 按 快速开始 配置 R2 CORS，然后访问 r2.viki.moe 。凭证只保存在浏览器本地。 为什么做 R2 Web？ Cloudflare 控制台适合基础操作，但大量文件的浏览、移动、重命名和临时上传并不高效；桌面客户端需要安装，CLI 又不适合所有人。R2 Web 希望补上一个随开随用、跨平台且专注 R2 的管理界面。 差异化优势 R2 Web 不替代复杂权限管理、自动化脚本或 API 集成；这些场景建议使用 Cloudflare 控制台、官方 SDK、CLI 或 rclone。 功能速览 界面截图 快速开始 1. 配置 R2 桶 CORS 在 Cloudflare 控制台进入 R2 → 存储桶 → 设置 → CORS 策略 ： 私有部署时，将 AllowedOrigins 替换为自己的域名。 ETag 是完成分片上传所必需的响应头。 2. 创建并填写凭证 创建权限限定到目标 bucket 的 R2 API Token，在 r2.viki.moe 填写 Account ID、Access…
read the full r2-web overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is syncthing or r2-web more popular?
syncthing has 90,252 GitHub stars and r2-web has 500. syncthing has the larger community by that measure.
Are syncthing and r2-web free?
Both are open source. syncthing is licensed under MPL-2.0 and r2-web under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between syncthing and r2-web?
syncthing is written in Go and r2-web in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, syncthing or r2-web?
Choose syncthing if you want the larger community (90,252 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose r2-web if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.