head to head · open source

Supabase vs web-maker

Supabase has 110,361 GitHub stars, 14,414 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped today. web-maker has 2,699 stars, 324 forks, 120 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Supabase leads on adoption by 3,989% (110,361 vs 2,699 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; web-maker is written in JavaScript under MIT. Supabase has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, web-maker 12%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 110K web-maker ★ 2.7K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase web-maker
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 2.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-08-03
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 324
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick web-maker if

  • You want the web-maker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and web-maker fits your workflow better

full web-maker profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About web-maker

Web Maker is an MIT licensed, offline frontend code editor and playground for HTML, CSS and JavaScript experiments that runs entirely on the user's own system, and it is aimed at frontend developers who want CodePen style quick prototyping without a network connection.

read the full web-maker overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

react vs supabase supabase vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs ECC Supabase vs react Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs puppeteer Supabase vs archify Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs i-have-adhd Supabase vs codebase-memory-mcp Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs it-tools Supabase vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or web-maker more popular?

Supabase has 110,361 GitHub stars and web-maker has 2,699. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and web-maker free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and web-maker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and web-maker?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and web-maker in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or web-maker?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (110,361 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose web-maker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.