head to head · open source

Supabase vs puppeteer

Supabase has 110,097 GitHub stars, 14,262 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped yesterday. puppeteer has 95,590 stars, 9,576 forks, 259 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Supabase leads on adoption by 15% (110,097 vs 95,590 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; puppeteer is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Supabase has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, puppeteer 10%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 110K puppeteer ★ 96K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase puppeteer
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 96K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 9.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick puppeteer if

  • You want the puppeteer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and puppeteer fits your workflow better

full puppeteer profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About puppeteer

Puppeteer is an Apache 2.0 JavaScript and TypeScript library that provides a high level API for driving Chrome and Firefox over the DevTools Protocol or WebDriver BiDi, written for developers who automate browsers from Node.js.

read the full puppeteer overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 262K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

react vs supabase supabase vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs ECC Supabase vs react Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs archify Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs it-tools Supabase vs herdr Supabase vs lapce Supabase vs TipTap Supabase vs Directus

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or puppeteer more popular?

Supabase has 110,097 GitHub stars and puppeteer has 95,590. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and puppeteer free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and puppeteer under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and puppeteer?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and puppeteer in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or puppeteer?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (110,097 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose puppeteer if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.