head to head · open source

Supabase vs profiler

Supabase has 111,240 GitHub stars, 16,039 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped yesterday. profiler has 1,536 stars, 496 forks, 862 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Supabase leads on adoption by 7,142% (111,240 vs 1,536 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; profiler is written in TypeScript under MPL-2.0. Supabase has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, profiler 32%. profiler was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 111K profiler ★ 1.5K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase profiler
GitHub stars ★ 111K ★ 1.5K
License Apache-2.0 MPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 496
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 111K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick profiler if

  • You want the profiler feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and profiler fits your workflow better

full profiler profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About profiler

Firefox Profiler is an open source web application for visualizing performance profiles recorded from Firefox and other profilers, built for developers and Mozilla engineers who need to diagnose slow pages, scripts, and browser behaviour.

read the full profiler overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 275K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

ecc vs supabase react vs supabase supabase vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs ECC Supabase vs react Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs puppeteer Supabase vs archify Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs i-have-adhd Supabase vs codebase-memory-mcp Supabase vs herdr Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or profiler more popular?

Supabase has 111,240 GitHub stars and profiler has 1,536. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and profiler free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and profiler under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and profiler?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and profiler in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or profiler?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (111,240 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose profiler if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.