head to head · open source

Supabase vs kubefwd

Supabase has 110,711 GitHub stars, 14,586 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kubefwd has 4,169 stars, 236 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. Supabase leads on adoption by 2,556% (110,711 vs 4,169 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; kubefwd is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Supabase has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, kubefwd 6%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 111K kubefwd ★ 4.2K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase kubefwd
GitHub stars ★ 111K ★ 4.2K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 236
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 111K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick kubefwd if

  • You want the kubefwd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and kubefwd fits your workflow better

full kubefwd profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About kubefwd

kubefwd (Kube Forward) is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go based command line utility that bulk port forwards Kubernetes services to a local workstation, giving each service its own unique 127.x.x.x loopback address and a matching /etc/hosts entry so that locally running code can reach cluster services by their in cluster names, and it is aimed at developers who build and test against a Kubernetes development cluster from their own machine.

read the full kubefwd overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 266K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 210K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 109K

Related comparisons

ecc vs supabase react vs supabase supabase vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs ECC Supabase vs react Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs puppeteer Supabase vs archify Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs i-have-adhd Supabase vs codebase-memory-mcp Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs it-tools Supabase vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or kubefwd more popular?

Supabase has 110,711 GitHub stars and kubefwd has 4,169. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and kubefwd free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and kubefwd under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and kubefwd?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and kubefwd in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or kubefwd?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (110,711 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose kubefwd if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.