head to head · open source

Supabase vs code-inspector

Supabase has 110,829 GitHub stars, 15,239 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped today. code-inspector has 3,038 stars, 241 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. Supabase leads on adoption by 3,548% (110,829 vs 3,038 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; code-inspector is written in TypeScript under MIT. Supabase has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, code-inspector 8%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 111K code-inspector ★ 3.0K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase code-inspector
GitHub stars ★ 111K ★ 3.0K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-28 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 241
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 111K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick code-inspector if

  • You want the code-inspector feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and code-inspector fits your workflow better

full code-inspector profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About code-inspector

code inspector is a TypeScript, MIT licensed developer tool that lets a developer click any element on a running web page and have their code editor open automatically with the cursor placed at that element's source code, and it is built for front end engineers working in bundler driven Vue, React, Svelte, Astro, and comparable component frameworks.

read the full code-inspector overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 269K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 210K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 110K

Related comparisons

ecc vs supabase react vs supabase supabase vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs ECC Supabase vs react Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs puppeteer Supabase vs archify Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs i-have-adhd Supabase vs codebase-memory-mcp Supabase vs herdr Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or code-inspector more popular?

Supabase has 110,829 GitHub stars and code-inspector has 3,038. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and code-inspector free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and code-inspector under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and code-inspector?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and code-inspector in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or code-inspector?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (110,829 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose code-inspector if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.