head to head · open source

Supabase vs ccs

Supabase has 110,097 GitHub stars, 14,262 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ccs has 2,856 stars, 260 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. Supabase leads on adoption by 3,755% (110,097 vs 2,856 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; ccs is written in TypeScript under MIT. Supabase has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, ccs 9%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 110K ccs ★ 2.9K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase ccs
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 2.9K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-11
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 260
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick ccs if

  • You want the ccs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and ccs fits your workflow better

full ccs profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About ccs

CCS is an MIT licensed TypeScript CLI that switches Claude Code and compatible CLI runtimes between multiple Claude accounts, OAuth providers such as Codex and xAI/Grok, and OpenAI compatible or local model endpoints through one stable ccs command surface, aimed at developers who hold several AI coding subscriptions or model providers at once.

read the full ccs overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 262K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

react vs supabase supabase vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs ECC Supabase vs react Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs puppeteer Supabase vs archify Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs it-tools Supabase vs herdr Supabase vs lapce Supabase vs TipTap

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or ccs more popular?

Supabase has 110,097 GitHub stars and ccs has 2,856. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and ccs free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ccs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and ccs?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and ccs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or ccs?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (110,097 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ccs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.