head to head · open source

Spacedrive vs Sync-in

Spacedrive has 39,003 GitHub stars, 1,350 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Sync-in has 1,769 stars, 136 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Spacedrive leads on adoption by 2,105% (39,003 vs 1,769 stars). Spacedrive is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence; Sync-in is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Spacedrive has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, Sync-in 8%. Sync-in was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Spacedrive ★ 39K Sync-in ★ 1.8K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Spacedrive Sync-in
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 1.8K
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in Rust TypeScript
Last push 2026-07-29 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 136
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Spacedrive if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Spacedrive profile →

pick Sync-in if

  • You want the Sync-in feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Sync-in fits your workflow better

full Sync-in profile →

About Spacedrive

Spacedrive is an open source, cross platform file explorer built on a virtual distributed filesystem written in Rust. It unifies local and remote storage—including cloud services like Dropbox, Google Drive, and S3—into a single interface, enabling unified search, browsing, and syncing across devices without centralized servers.

read the full Spacedrive overview →

About Sync-in

Sync in is a self hosted platform for file storage, synchronization, and team collaboration. It lives in the self hosted file management ecosystem, alongside homelab, on premise, and cloud alternative use cases. The project is written in TypeScript and licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full Sync-in overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs sync-in localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs hoodik n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Spacedrive vs LocalSend Spacedrive vs Nextcloud Spacedrive vs Seafile Spacedrive vs PairDrop Spacedrive vs OpenCloud Spacedrive vs ownCloud Spacedrive vs Hoodik Spacedrive vs Cozy Spacedrive vs Twake Drive Spacedrive vs Firefiles

Frequently asked questions

Is Spacedrive or Sync-in more popular?

Spacedrive has 39,003 GitHub stars and Sync-in has 1,769. Spacedrive has the larger community by that measure.

Are Spacedrive and Sync-in free?

Both are open source. Spacedrive has no licence declared in this registry, and Sync-in is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Spacedrive and Sync-in?

Spacedrive is written in Rust and Sync-in in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Spacedrive or Sync-in?

Choose Spacedrive if you want the larger community (39,003 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Sync-in if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.