head to head · open source

Spacedrive vs Hoodik

Spacedrive has 39,003 GitHub stars, 1,350 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Hoodik has 1,475 stars, 68 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. Spacedrive leads on adoption by 2,544% (39,003 vs 1,475 stars). Spacedrive is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence; Hoodik is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. Spacedrive has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, Hoodik 5%. Hoodik was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Spacedrive ★ 39K Hoodik ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Spacedrive Hoodik
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 1.5K
License Custom / other Custom / other
Written in Rust Rust
Last push 2026-07-29 2026-08-29
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 68
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Spacedrive if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Spacedrive profile →

pick Hoodik if

  • You want the Hoodik feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Hoodik fits your workflow better

full Hoodik profile →

About Spacedrive

Spacedrive is an open source, cross platform file explorer built on a virtual distributed filesystem written in Rust. It unifies local and remote storage—including cloud services like Dropbox, Google Drive, and S3—into a single interface, enabling unified search, browsing, and syncing across devices without centralized servers.

read the full Spacedrive overview →

About Hoodik

Hoodik is a self hosted, end to end encrypted cloud storage server. It lives in the Rust and Vue ecosystem, using Actix web on the backend and Vue 3 on the frontend, and it is packaged as a Docker first service with SQLite or PostgreSQL and S3 compatible storage options.

read the full Hoodik overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs hoodik localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Spacedrive vs LocalSend Spacedrive vs Nextcloud Spacedrive vs Seafile Spacedrive vs PairDrop Spacedrive vs OpenCloud Spacedrive vs ownCloud Spacedrive vs Sync-in Spacedrive vs Cozy Spacedrive vs Twake Drive Spacedrive vs Firefiles

Frequently asked questions

Is Spacedrive or Hoodik more popular?

Spacedrive has 39,003 GitHub stars and Hoodik has 1,475. Spacedrive has the larger community by that measure.

Are Spacedrive and Hoodik free?

Neither Spacedrive nor Hoodik declares a licence in this registry, so check each project's own repository before relying on either for a commercial use. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Spacedrive and Hoodik?

Spacedrive is written in Rust and Hoodik in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Spacedrive or Hoodik?

Choose Spacedrive if you want the larger community (39,003 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Hoodik if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.