head to head · open source

SigNoz vs open-multi-agent

SigNoz has 32,146 GitHub stars, 2,497 forks, 1,557 open issues and last shipped today. open-multi-agent has 6,943 stars, 2,433 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. SigNoz leads on adoption by 363% (32,146 vs 6,943 stars). SigNoz is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. SigNoz has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, open-multi-agent 35%. SigNoz was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

SigNoz ★ 32K open-multi-agent ★ 6.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

SigNoz open-multi-agent
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 6.9K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 2.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick SigNoz if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full SigNoz profile →

pick open-multi-agent if

  • You want the open-multi-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and open-multi-agent fits your workflow better

full open-multi-agent profile →

About SigNoz

SigNoz is an open source, OpenTelemetry native observability platform for cloud native applications. It unifies logs, metrics, traces, alerts, and dashboards into a single tool, replacing fragmented monitoring stacks with a correlated signal pipeline. It lives in the observability ecosystem alongside tools like Prometheus, Jaeger, and Grafana, and is positioned as an open alternative to Datadog.

read the full SigNoz overview →

About open-multi-agent

OMA (Open Multi Agent) is a self hosted TypeScript agent runtime for teams that need consequential agent actions to wait for durable, tamper evident approvals and every run to leave a record that can be verified offline, byte for byte.

read the full open-multi-agent overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

SigNoz vs Uptime Kuma SigNoz vs worldmonitor SigNoz vs NetData SigNoz vs Grafana SigNoz vs huginn SigNoz vs Sentry SigNoz vs Grafana Loki SigNoz vs beszel SigNoz vs cilium SigNoz vs Apache SkyWalking SigNoz vs jaeger SigNoz vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is SigNoz or open-multi-agent more popular?

SigNoz has 32,146 GitHub stars and open-multi-agent has 6,943. SigNoz has the larger community by that measure.

Are SigNoz and open-multi-agent free?

Both are open source. SigNoz has no licence declared in this registry, and open-multi-agent is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between SigNoz and open-multi-agent?

SigNoz is written in TypeScript and open-multi-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, SigNoz or open-multi-agent?

Choose SigNoz if you want the larger community (32,146 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose open-multi-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.