head to head · open source
SigNoz vs evo
SigNoz has 32,525 GitHub stars, 2,576 forks, 1,557 open issues and last shipped yesterday. evo has 4,356 stars, 805 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. SigNoz leads on adoption by 647% (32,525 vs 4,356 stars). SigNoz is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; evo is written in Python under GPL-3.0. SigNoz has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, evo 18%. SigNoz was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (metrics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| SigNoz | evo | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | Custom / other | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 805 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick SigNoz if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick evo if
- You want the evo feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and evo fits your workflow better
About SigNoz
中文 · Deutsch · Português SigNoz is an open source observability platform built on OpenTelemetry. We’re building an enterprise grade alternative to fragmented monitoring stacks, with logs, metrics, traces, alerts, and dashboards in one place. Choose how to run SigNoz SigNoz Cloud (Recommended) Fully managed SigNoz with a 30 day free trial, no credit card required, usage based pricing that starts at $49, and regional data hosting. Start free → Enterprise Enterprise Cloud, BYOC, or Enterprise Self Hosted with compliance, support, custom retention, RBAC, ingestion controls, data residency, and region selection…
read the full SigNoz overview →
About evo
evo Python package for the evaluation of odometry and SLAM This package provides executables and a small library for handling, evaluating and comparing the trajectory output of odometry and SLAM algorithms. Supported trajectory formats: 'TUM' trajectory files 'KITTI' pose files 'EuRoC MAV' (.csv groundtruth and TUM trajectory file) ROS and ROS2 bagfile with geometry msgs/PoseStamped , geometry msgs/TransformStamped , geometry msgs/PoseWithCovarianceStamped , geometry msgs/PointStamped or nav msgs/Odometry topics or TF messages See here for more infos about the formats. Why? evo has several advantages over other…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is SigNoz or evo more popular?
SigNoz has 32,525 GitHub stars and evo has 4,356. SigNoz has the larger community by that measure.
Are SigNoz and evo free?
Both are open source. SigNoz has no licence declared in this registry, and evo is licensed under GPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between SigNoz and evo?
SigNoz is written in TypeScript and evo in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, SigNoz or evo?
Choose SigNoz if you want the larger community (32,525 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose evo if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.