head to head · open source
shynet vs GEOInflow
shynet has 3,157 GitHub stars, 212 forks, 63 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. GEOInflow has 688 stars, 223 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. shynet leads on adoption by 359% (3,157 vs 688 stars). shynet is written in Python under Apache-2.0; GEOInflow is written in TypeScript under MIT. shynet has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, GEOInflow 32%. GEOInflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (self-hosted, web-analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| shynet | GEOInflow | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 3.2K | ★ 688 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-03-15 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 212 | ⑂ 223 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick shynet if
- You weight community size — 3.2K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick GEOInflow if
- You want the GEOInflow feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and GEOInflow fits your workflow better
About shynet
Modern, privacy friendly, and cookie free web analytics. Getting started » Screenshots • Features • Office Hours Motivation There are a lot of web analytics tools. Unfortunately, most of them come with the following caveats: They require handing all of your visitors' info to a third party company They use cookies to track visitors across sessions, so you need to have those annoying cookie notices They collect so much personal data that even the NSA is jealous They are closed source and/or expensive, often with limited data portability They are hard to use Shynet has none of these caveats. You host it…
read the full shynet overview →
About GEOInflow
GEOInflow English 简体中文 Self hosted web and AI crawler analytics for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). Jointly published by 猎看科技 · 北京日报社智源GEO Quick start · Deployment · AI crawler analytics · Architecture · Documentation · Contributing GEOInflow brings website visitors, AI search referrals, server crawl logs, and content inventories into a shared website context. It helps teams understand which AI crawlers visit their sites, which pages they request, which important pages have no observed crawl activity, where requests fail, and how AI search contributes visitors and conversions. The system includes browser…
read the full GEOInflow overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Web & Product Analytics projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.
Frequently asked questions
Is shynet or GEOInflow more popular?
shynet has 3,157 GitHub stars and GEOInflow has 688. shynet has the larger community by that measure.
Are shynet and GEOInflow free?
Both are open source. shynet is licensed under Apache-2.0 and GEOInflow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between shynet and GEOInflow?
shynet is written in Python and GEOInflow in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, shynet or GEOInflow?
Choose shynet if you want the larger community (3,157 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose GEOInflow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.