head to head · open source

seaweedfs vs bigfunctions

seaweedfs has 34,823 GitHub stars, 3,002 forks, 772 open issues and last shipped today. bigfunctions has 759 stars, 70 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 27 days ago. seaweedfs leads on adoption by 4,488% (34,823 vs 759 stars). seaweedfs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; bigfunctions is written in Python under MIT. seaweedfs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, bigfunctions 9%. seaweedfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

seaweedfs ★ 35K bigfunctions ★ 759 category Data & Analytics

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

seaweedfs bigfunctions
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 759
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-23
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 70
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick seaweedfs if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full seaweedfs profile →

pick bigfunctions if

  • You want the bigfunctions feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and bigfunctions fits your workflow better

full bigfunctions profile →

About seaweedfs

SeaweedFS is an Apache 2.0 distributed storage system written in Go that serves an S3 compatible object store, a POSIX file system, and Iceberg lakehouse tables from one weed binary, built for storing and serving billions of files with O(1) disk access.

read the full seaweedfs overview →

About bigfunctions

BigFunctions is an open source Python framework, released under the MIT licence, for building a governed catalog of BigQuery functions — packaged with a community library of more than 150 functions that can be called directly or redeployed — and it is aimed at data engineers, analysts, and teams working inside Google BigQuery.

read the full bigfunctions overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

seaweedfs vs ClickHouse seaweedfs vs rustfs seaweedfs vs parse-server seaweedfs vs Apache Pinot seaweedfs vs dlt seaweedfs vs mountpoint-s3 seaweedfs vs hue seaweedfs vs bigquery-utils seaweedfs vs arc

Frequently asked questions

Is seaweedfs or bigfunctions more popular?

seaweedfs has 34,823 GitHub stars and bigfunctions has 759. seaweedfs has the larger community by that measure.

Are seaweedfs and bigfunctions free?

Both are open source. seaweedfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and bigfunctions under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between seaweedfs and bigfunctions?

seaweedfs is written in Go and bigfunctions in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, seaweedfs or bigfunctions?

Choose seaweedfs if you want the larger community (34,823 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose bigfunctions if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.