head to head · open source

Screenity vs chatGPTBox

Screenity has 18,703 GitHub stars, 1,521 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. chatGPTBox has 10,755 stars, 874 forks, 211 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Screenity leads on adoption by 74% (18,703 vs 10,755 stars). Screenity is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0; chatGPTBox is written in JavaScript under MIT. Screenity has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, chatGPTBox 8%. chatGPTBox was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chrome-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Screenity ★ 19K chatGPTBox ★ 11K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Screenity chatGPTBox
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 11K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 874
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Screenity if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Screenity profile →

pick chatGPTBox if

  • You want the chatGPTBox feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and chatGPTBox fits your workflow better

full chatGPTBox profile →

About Screenity

Screenity is a JavaScript Chrome extension under the GPL 3.0 license that records the screen and supports annotation in the browser. It lives in the Chrome extension ecosystem and is distributed through the Chrome Web Store, while its source code is available on GitHub.

read the full Screenity overview →

About chatGPTBox

chatGPTBox is a free, MIT licensed browser extension that puts deep ChatGPT and multi model AI integration into Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari, and Android, aimed at people who want assistant features on any page rather than in a separate tab.

read the full chatGPTBox overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Screenity vs uBlock Screenity vs Ladybird Screenity vs chrome-devtools-mcp Screenity vs monaco-editor Screenity vs Zen Browser Screenity vs servo Screenity vs serenity Screenity vs refined-github Screenity vs slate Screenity vs Avalonia Screenity vs webtorrent Screenity vs fingerprintjs

Frequently asked questions

Is Screenity or chatGPTBox more popular?

Screenity has 18,703 GitHub stars and chatGPTBox has 10,755. Screenity has the larger community by that measure.

Are Screenity and chatGPTBox free?

Both are open source. Screenity is licensed under GPL-3.0 and chatGPTBox under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Screenity and chatGPTBox?

Screenity is written in JavaScript and chatGPTBox in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Screenity or chatGPTBox?

Choose Screenity if you want the larger community (18,703 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose chatGPTBox if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.