head to head · open source

Ryot vs Tonkatsu Box

Ryot has 3,597 GitHub stars, 129 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Tonkatsu Box has 539 stars, 28 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Ryot leads on adoption by 567% (3,597 vs 539 stars). Ryot is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; Tonkatsu Box is written in Dart under MIT. Ryot has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Tonkatsu Box 5%. Ryot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ryot ★ 3.6K Tonkatsu Box ★ 539 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ryot Tonkatsu Box
GitHub stars ★ 3.6K ★ 539
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Dart
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 129 ⑂ 28
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ryot if

  • You weight community size — 3.6K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ryot profile →

pick Tonkatsu Box if

  • You want the Tonkatsu Box feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and Tonkatsu Box fits your workflow better

full Tonkatsu Box profile →

About Ryot

Ryot (Roll Your Own Tracker) is a self hosted platform for tracking media consumption and fitness activity, aimed at people who want their tracking data kept on their own hardware instead of in someone else's account.

read the full Ryot overview →

About Tonkatsu Box

Tonkatsu Box is a free, MIT licensed Flutter application for Windows, macOS, Linux and Android that keeps games, movies, TV shows, anime, visual novels, manga, books, music and podcasts in a single personal collection manager.

read the full Tonkatsu Box overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

karakeep vs ryot karakeep vs linkwarden karakeep vs wallabag karakeep vs linkding linkwarden vs wallabag karakeep vs seriesguide linkwarden vs linkding karakeep vs showly n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Bookmark & Content Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Bookmark & Content Management field.

Ryot vs Karakeep Ryot vs Linkwarden Ryot vs Wallabag Ryot vs Linkding Ryot vs SeriesGuide Ryot vs Showly Ryot vs Faved Ryot vs Bookmark It Ryot vs Readeck Ryot vs Brace.to Ryot vs Cloudmark Ryot vs Capd

Frequently asked questions

Is Ryot or Tonkatsu Box more popular?

Ryot has 3,597 GitHub stars and Tonkatsu Box has 539. Ryot has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ryot and Tonkatsu Box free?

Both are open source. Ryot is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Tonkatsu Box under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ryot and Tonkatsu Box?

Ryot is written in TypeScript and Tonkatsu Box in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ryot or Tonkatsu Box?

Choose Ryot if you want the larger community (3,597 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Tonkatsu Box if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.