head to head · open source

Ryot vs Readeck

Ryot has 3,597 GitHub stars, 129 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Readeck has 275 stars, 0 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2.8 years ago. Ryot leads on adoption by 1,208% (3,597 vs 275 stars). Ryot is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; Readeck is written in various languages under a licence not recorded in this registry. Ryot has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Readeck 0%. Ryot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ryot ★ 3.6K Readeck ★ 275 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ryot Readeck
GitHub stars ★ 3.6K ★ 275
License GPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2023-12-18
Forks ⑂ 129 ⑂ 0
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ryot if

  • You weight community size — 3.6K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ryot profile →

pick Readeck if

  • You want the Readeck feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You evaluated both and Readeck fits your workflow better

full Readeck profile →

About Ryot

Ryot (Roll Your Own Tracker) is a self hosted platform for tracking media consumption and fitness activity, aimed at people who want their tracking data kept on their own hardware instead of in someone else's account.

read the full Ryot overview →

About Readeck

Readeck is a tool for saving, organizing and revisiting web content, aimed at people who want to keep the pages they read and come back to them later.

read the full Readeck overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

karakeep vs ryot karakeep vs linkwarden karakeep vs wallabag karakeep vs linkding linkwarden vs wallabag karakeep vs seriesguide linkwarden vs linkding karakeep vs showly n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Bookmark & Content Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Bookmark & Content Management field.

Ryot vs Karakeep Ryot vs Linkwarden Ryot vs Wallabag Ryot vs Linkding Ryot vs SeriesGuide Ryot vs Showly Ryot vs Faved Ryot vs Tonkatsu Box Ryot vs Bookmark It Ryot vs Brace.to Ryot vs Cloudmark Ryot vs Capd

Frequently asked questions

Is Ryot or Readeck more popular?

Ryot has 3,597 GitHub stars and Readeck has 275. Ryot has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ryot and Readeck free?

Both are open source. Ryot is licensed under GPL-3.0, and Readeck has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Ryot and Readeck?

Ryot is written in TypeScript and Readeck in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ryot or Readeck?

Choose Ryot if you want the larger community (3,597 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Readeck if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.