head to head · open source

rtk vs Orca

rtk has 80,883 GitHub stars, 5,130 forks, 1,642 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Orca has 71,278 stars, 4,665 forks, 5,801 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rtk leads on adoption by 13% (80,883 vs 71,278 stars). rtk is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; Orca is written in TypeScript under MIT. rtk has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Orca 7%. Orca was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (claude-code, cli), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rtk ★ 81K Orca ★ 71K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

rtk Orca
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 71K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Rust TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 4.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rtk if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rtk profile →

pick Orca if

  • You want the Orca feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Orca fits your workflow better

full Orca profile →

About rtk

rtk is an Apache 2.0 Rust CLI proxy that sits between an AI coding agent and the shell, filtering and compressing command output so 60 90% fewer tokens reach the model, and it is built for developers running agentic coding tools such as Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex against real repositories.

read the full rtk overview →

About Orca

Orca is an agent desktop environment (ADE) that runs multiple AI coding agents in parallel, each in its own isolated git worktree. It unifies workflow, monitoring, and collaboration around AI assisted coding across desktop, mobile, and remote runtimes. Built for developers who rely on several AI coding tools simultaneously, Orca eliminates context switching by tracking all agents and their outputs in one place.

read the full Orca overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs harness supabase vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

rtk vs OpenCode rtk vs pi rtk vs OpenHands rtk vs Paperclip rtk vs codegraph rtk vs Cline rtk vs Aider rtk vs Continue rtk vs Tabby rtk vs Grok Build rtk vs T3 Code rtk vs Dyad

Frequently asked questions

Is rtk or Orca more popular?

rtk has 80,883 GitHub stars and Orca has 71,278. rtk has the larger community by that measure.

Are rtk and Orca free?

Both are open source. rtk is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Orca under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rtk and Orca?

rtk is written in Rust and Orca in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rtk or Orca?

Choose rtk if you want the larger community (80,883 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Orca if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.