head to head · open source

caveman vs Orca

caveman has 116,900 GitHub stars, 6,789 forks, 155 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Orca has 113,485 stars, 7,169 forks, 5,801 open issues and last shipped yesterday. caveman leads on adoption by 3% (116,900 vs 113,485 stars). caveman is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Orca is written in TypeScript under MIT. caveman has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Orca 6%. Orca was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (claude-code), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caveman ★ 117K Orca ★ 113K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

caveman Orca
GitHub stars ★ 117K ★ 113K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 6.8K ⑂ 7.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caveman if

  • You weight community size — 117K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caveman profile →

pick Orca if

  • You want the Orca feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Orca fits your workflow better

full Orca profile →

About caveman

why use many token when few do trick Your AI coding agent bills by the word and writes like it knows that. Caveman make it stop. ▶️ ThePrimeagen reacts: "No way this actually works" 🏆 1 on GitHub Trending · July 2026 · 🥇 1 Repository of the Day on Trendshift · April 2026 1 on Hacker News · 904 points · 366 comments · 8 Product of the Day on Product Hunt 📄 Cited in CAVEWOMAN , an Adobe Research paper that measured caveman style output cutting cost 1.4 to 2.4×, up to 3× · 🧪 Tested by JetBrains on 86 real coding tasks: "costs you nothing measurable in quality" ⚡ One command, no account, no API key. npx skills…

read the full caveman overview →

About Orca

Orca 中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Español · Français · Português The AI Orchestrator for 100x builders. Run Codex, ClaudeCode, OpenCode or Pi side by side — each in its own worktree, tracked in one place. Download Orca Features Mobile Companion Monitor and steer your agents from your phone — get notified when an agent finishes and send follow ups from anywhere. iOS App Store · TestFlight · Android APK 0.0.48 · Docs → Parallel Worktrees Fan one prompt across five agents, each in its own isolated git worktree — compare the results and merge the winner. Docs → Terminal Splits Ghostty class terminals with WebGL rendering…

read the full Orca overview →

More in Developer Tools

Related comparisons

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

Frequently asked questions

Is caveman or Orca more popular?

caveman has 116,900 GitHub stars and Orca has 113,485. caveman has the larger community by that measure.

Are caveman and Orca free?

Both are open source. caveman is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Orca under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caveman and Orca?

caveman is written in Go and Orca in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caveman or Orca?

Choose caveman if you want the larger community (116,900 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Orca if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.