head to head · open source

Orca vs codegraph

Orca has 72,812 GitHub stars, 4,763 forks, 5,801 open issues and last shipped today. codegraph has 71,514 stars, 4,598 forks, 526 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Orca leads on adoption by 2% (72,812 vs 71,514 stars). Orca is written in TypeScript under MIT; codegraph is written in C under MIT. Orca has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, codegraph 6%. Orca was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Orca ★ 73K codegraph ★ 72K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Orca codegraph
GitHub stars ★ 73K ★ 72K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript C
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 4.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Orca if

  • You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Orca profile →

pick codegraph if

  • You want the codegraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and codegraph fits your workflow better

full codegraph profile →

About Orca

Orca is an agent desktop environment (ADE) that runs multiple AI coding agents in parallel, each in its own isolated git worktree. It unifies workflow, monitoring, and collaboration around AI assisted coding across desktop, mobile, and remote runtimes. Built for developers who rely on several AI coding tools simultaneously, Orca eliminates context switching by tracking all agents and their outputs in one place.

read the full Orca overview →

About codegraph

CodeGraph is a pre indexed code knowledge graph that runs locally and wires into AI coding agents — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, AntiGravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and Hermes Agent — so those agents query a semantic map of the codebase instead of reading files one at a time.

read the full codegraph overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

codegraph vs code-review-graph openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

Orca vs OpenCode Orca vs pi Orca vs OpenHands Orca vs Paperclip Orca vs rtk Orca vs Cline Orca vs Aider Orca vs Continue Orca vs Tabby Orca vs Grok Build Orca vs T3 Code Orca vs Dyad

Frequently asked questions

Is Orca or codegraph more popular?

Orca has 72,812 GitHub stars and codegraph has 71,514. Orca has the larger community by that measure.

Are Orca and codegraph free?

Both are open source. Orca is licensed under MIT and codegraph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Orca and codegraph?

Orca is written in TypeScript and codegraph in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Orca or codegraph?

Choose Orca if you want the larger community (72,812 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose codegraph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.