head to head · open source

rtk vs Grok Build

rtk has 80,883 GitHub stars, 5,130 forks, 1,642 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Grok Build has 26,827 stars, 5,048 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rtk leads on adoption by 201% (80,883 vs 26,827 stars). rtk is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; Grok Build is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. rtk has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Grok Build 19%. rtk was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rtk ★ 81K Grok Build ★ 27K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

rtk Grok Build
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 27K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 5.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rtk if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rtk profile →

pick Grok Build if

  • You want the Grok Build feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Grok Build fits your workflow better

full Grok Build profile →

About rtk

rtk is an Apache 2.0 Rust CLI proxy that sits between an AI coding agent and the shell, filtering and compressing command output so 60 90% fewer tokens reach the model, and it is built for developers running agentic coding tools such as Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex against real repositories.

read the full rtk overview →

About Grok Build

Grok Build is a terminal based AI coding agent developed by SpaceXAI, distributed as the grok CLI/TUI. It operates as a fullscreen, mouse interactive interface that integrates with the user’s codebase to perform code editing, command execution, web search, and long running task orchestration. The project lives in the Rust ecosystem and is licensed under Apache 2.0.

read the full Grok Build overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs harness supabase vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

rtk vs OpenCode rtk vs pi rtk vs OpenHands rtk vs Paperclip rtk vs codegraph rtk vs Orca rtk vs Cline rtk vs Aider rtk vs Continue rtk vs Tabby rtk vs T3 Code rtk vs Dyad

Frequently asked questions

Is rtk or Grok Build more popular?

rtk has 80,883 GitHub stars and Grok Build has 26,827. rtk has the larger community by that measure.

Are rtk and Grok Build free?

Both are open source. rtk is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Grok Build under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rtk and Grok Build?

rtk is written in Rust and Grok Build in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rtk or Grok Build?

Choose rtk if you want the larger community (80,883 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Grok Build if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.