head to head · open source
rtk vs codegraph
rtk has 85,252 GitHub stars, 5,454 forks, 1,642 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codegraph has 76,175 stars, 5,062 forks, 233 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rtk leads on adoption by 12% (85,252 vs 76,175 stars). rtk is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; codegraph is written in TypeScript under MIT. rtk has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, codegraph 7%. rtk was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| rtk | codegraph | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 85K | ★ 76K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Rust | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.5K | ⑂ 5.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick rtk if
- You weight community size — 85K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codegraph if
- You want the codegraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and codegraph fits your workflow better
About rtk
High performance CLI proxy that cuts up to 90% of the bash output your agent reads Website • Install • Troubleshooting • Architecture • Discord English • Francais • 中文 • 日本語 • 한국어 • Espanol • Português rtk filters and compresses command outputs before they reach your LLM context. Single Rust binary, 100+ supported commands, Full explanation: How RTK Savings Work Installation Homebrew (recommended) winget (Windows) Easiest way to install on Windows — one command, no PATH setup needed: Quick Install (Linux/macOS) Installs to /.local/bin . Add to PATH if needed…
About codegraph
CodeGraph Already installed? Run codegraph upgrade Follow @getcodegraph on X for updates. Supercharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode, Hermes Agent, Gemini, Antigravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and more with Semantic Code Intelligence The fastest complete code graph · surgical context · built for how agents actually work · 100% local Kernel powered by Rust Documentation & Website → The CodeGraph platform is coming — for every PR, know exactly what to test, what could break, which flows are affected, and whether business logic is compromised. Get early beta access to the hosted product · getcodegraph.com…
read the full codegraph overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More AI Assisted Coding projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.
Frequently asked questions
Is rtk or codegraph more popular?
rtk has 85,252 GitHub stars and codegraph has 76,175. rtk has the larger community by that measure.
Are rtk and codegraph free?
Both are open source. rtk is licensed under Apache-2.0 and codegraph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between rtk and codegraph?
rtk is written in Rust and codegraph in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, rtk or codegraph?
Choose rtk if you want the larger community (85,252 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose codegraph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.