head to head · open source

rtk vs Forgecode

rtk has 80,930 GitHub stars, 5,134 forks, 1,642 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Forgecode has 7,634 stars, 1,466 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rtk leads on adoption by 960% (80,930 vs 7,634 stars). rtk is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; Forgecode is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. rtk has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Forgecode 19%. Forgecode was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rtk ★ 81K Forgecode ★ 7.6K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

rtk Forgecode
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 7.6K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rtk if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rtk profile →

pick Forgecode if

  • You want the Forgecode feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Forgecode fits your workflow better

full Forgecode profile →

About rtk

rtk is an Apache 2.0 Rust CLI proxy that sits between an AI coding agent and the shell, filtering and compressing command output so 60 90% fewer tokens reach the model, and it is built for developers running agentic coding tools such as Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex against real repositories.

read the full rtk overview →

About Forgecode

Forgecode is a terminal native AI coding agent written in Rust and built on ZSH that drives Claude, GPT, the O series, Grok, Deepseek, Gemini and more than 300 models through one command line interface, aimed at developers who want an AI pair programmer without leaving the shell.

read the full Forgecode overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 262K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

rtk vs OpenCode rtk vs pi rtk vs OpenHands rtk vs Paperclip rtk vs Orca rtk vs codegraph rtk vs Cline rtk vs Aider rtk vs Continue rtk vs Tabby rtk vs Grok Build rtk vs T3 Code

Frequently asked questions

Is rtk or Forgecode more popular?

rtk has 80,930 GitHub stars and Forgecode has 7,634. rtk has the larger community by that measure.

Are rtk and Forgecode free?

Both are open source. rtk is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Forgecode under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rtk and Forgecode?

rtk is written in Rust and Forgecode in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rtk or Forgecode?

Choose rtk if you want the larger community (80,930 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Forgecode if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.