head to head · open source

AnotherRedisDesktopManager vs rocksdb

AnotherRedisDesktopManager has 34,838 GitHub stars, 2,714 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. rocksdb has 32,241 stars, 7,006 forks, 1,645 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AnotherRedisDesktopManager leads on adoption by 8% (34,838 vs 32,241 stars). AnotherRedisDesktopManager is written in JavaScript under MIT; rocksdb is written in C++ under GPL-2.0. AnotherRedisDesktopManager has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, rocksdb 22%. rocksdb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AnotherRedisDesktopManager ★ 35K rocksdb ★ 32K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AnotherRedisDesktopManager rocksdb
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 32K
License MIT GPL-2.0
Written in JavaScript C++
Last push 2026-08-20 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 7.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AnotherRedisDesktopManager if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AnotherRedisDesktopManager profile →

pick rocksdb if

  • You want the rocksdb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and rocksdb fits your workflow better

full rocksdb profile →

About AnotherRedisDesktopManager

Another Redis Desktop Manager 🚀🚀🚀 A faster, better and more stable redis desktop manager, compatible with Linux, windows, mac. What's more, it won't crash when loading massive keys. 简体中文 Windows Download latest exe package from release \or [gitee in China\], double click to install. Or by chocolatey : choco install another redis desktop manager Or by winget : winget install qishibo.AnotherRedisDesktopManager Or sponsor by win store, It's not free, and I will be very grateful to you. Linux Download latest AppImage package from release \or [gitee in China\], chmod +x , double click to run. Or by snap : sudo…

read the full AnotherRedisDesktopManager overview →

About rocksdb

RocksDB: A Persistent Key Value Store for Flash and RAM Storage RocksDB is developed and maintained by Facebook Database Engineering Team. It is built on earlier work on LevelDB by Sanjay Ghemawat (sanjay@google.com) and Jeff Dean (jeff@google.com) This code is a library that forms the core building block for a fast key value server, especially suited for storing data on flash drives. It has a Log Structured Merge Database (LSM) design with flexible tradeoffs between Write Amplification Factor (WAF), Read Amplification Factor (RAF) and Space Amplification Factor (SAF). It has multi threaded compactions, making…

read the full rocksdb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Frequently asked questions

Is AnotherRedisDesktopManager or rocksdb more popular?

AnotherRedisDesktopManager has 34,838 GitHub stars and rocksdb has 32,241. AnotherRedisDesktopManager has the larger community by that measure.

Are AnotherRedisDesktopManager and rocksdb free?

Both are open source. AnotherRedisDesktopManager is licensed under MIT and rocksdb under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AnotherRedisDesktopManager and rocksdb?

AnotherRedisDesktopManager is written in JavaScript and rocksdb in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AnotherRedisDesktopManager or rocksdb?

Choose AnotherRedisDesktopManager if you want the larger community (34,838 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rocksdb if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.