head to head · open source

rea vs ccs

rea has 422,352 GitHub stars, 105,329 forks, 70 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ccs has 2,894 stars, 276 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. rea leads on adoption by 14,494% (422,352 vs 2,894 stars). rea is written in TypeScript under MIT; ccs is written in TypeScript under MIT. rea has attracted 25% as many forks as stars, ccs 10%. rea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (claude-code), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rea ★ 422K ccs ★ 2.9K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rea ccs
GitHub stars ★ 422K ★ 2.9K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-27
Forks ⑂ 105K ⑂ 276
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rea if

  • You weight community size — 422K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rea profile →

pick ccs if

  • You want the ccs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and ccs fits your workflow better

full ccs profile →

About rea

English · 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Türkçe · Русский · Tiếng Việt · ไทย · Deutsch · Español · Français · Українська · Polski · Português (Brasil) · العربية · فارسی REA: Reverse Engineer Anything One MCP for reverse engineering across binaries, applications, and runtime behavior. See a feature you like. Understand how it works, down to the binary level. Website · Guides · Showcases Quick start · How REA works · What you can analyze · Showcases · FAQ · Documentation npx rea agents setup Join the Reverse Engineering Community Discord · Q&A · Show and Tell See a feature in an app that you want in your own product?…

read the full rea overview →

About ccs

CCS Claude Codex Switch The multi provider profile and runtime manager for Claude Code and compatible CLIs Run Claude, Codex, Droid routed profiles, GLM, local models, and Anthropic compatible APIs without config thrash. Website Documentation Product Tour CLI Reference [Docker] ghcr.io/kaitranntt/ccs dashboard:latest is deprecated. Use ghcr.io/kaitranntt/ccs:latest instead. See 1251 and docker/README.md for migration details. To wire a sibling container to CLIProxy, see Connect your app to CLIProxy. Quick Start (Docker) With Docker installed: Dashboard at · CLIProxy at Need a corporate proxy alternative?…

read the full ccs overview →

More in Developer Tools

Related comparisons

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Frequently asked questions

Is rea or ccs more popular?

rea has 422,352 GitHub stars and ccs has 2,894. rea has the larger community by that measure.

Are rea and ccs free?

Both are open source. rea is licensed under MIT and ccs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rea and ccs?

rea is written in TypeScript and ccs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rea or ccs?

Choose rea if you want the larger community (422,352 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ccs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.