head to head · open source

AppSmith vs rea

AppSmith has 41,040 GitHub stars, 4,794 forks, 4,467 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rea has 29,472 stars, 3,500 forks, 70 open issues and last shipped today. AppSmith leads on adoption by 39% (41,040 vs 29,472 stars). AppSmith is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; rea is written in TypeScript under MIT. AppSmith has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, rea 12%. rea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AppSmith ★ 41K rea ★ 29K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AppSmith rea
GitHub stars ★ 41K ★ 29K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-09
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 3.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AppSmith if

  • You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AppSmith profile →

pick rea if

  • You want the rea feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and rea fits your workflow better

full rea profile →

About AppSmith

Appsmith is an open source, Apache 2.0 low code platform written primarily in TypeScript that lets teams build custom internal tools such as admin panels, dashboards, and CRUD applications on top of their own databases and APIs.

read the full AppSmith overview →

About rea

REA is an open source MCP server and CLI that lets AI coding agents — and your terminal — reverse engineer native binaries, JavaScript and Electron apps, .NET assemblies, and websites, with evidence attached to every conclusion.

read the full rea overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 275K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

AppSmith vs ECC AppSmith vs react AppSmith vs Langflow AppSmith vs Supabase AppSmith vs puppeteer AppSmith vs archify AppSmith vs PocketBase AppSmith vs i-have-adhd AppSmith vs codebase-memory-mcp AppSmith vs herdr AppSmith vs ToolJet AppSmith vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is AppSmith or rea more popular?

AppSmith has 41,040 GitHub stars and rea has 29,472. AppSmith has the larger community by that measure.

Are AppSmith and rea free?

Both are open source. AppSmith is licensed under Apache-2.0 and rea under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AppSmith and rea?

AppSmith is written in TypeScript and rea in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AppSmith or rea?

Choose AppSmith if you want the larger community (41,040 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose rea if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.