head to head · open source

rclone vs zrok

rclone has 59,844 GitHub stars, 5,413 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zrok has 4,711 stars, 224 forks, 125 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. rclone leads on adoption by 1,170% (59,844 vs 4,711 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; zrok is written in Go under Apache-2.0. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, zrok 5%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K zrok ★ 4.7K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone zrok
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 4.7K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-06-22
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 224
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick zrok if

  • You want the zrok feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and zrok fits your workflow better

full zrok profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About zrok

zrok is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed secure sharing tool written in Go that lets developers, operators, and self hosters expose web services, folders, and TCP or UDP resources over the internet or to specific users without firewall changes or port forwarding.

read the full zrok overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or zrok more popular?

rclone has 59,844 GitHub stars and zrok has 4,711. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and zrok free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and zrok under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and zrok?

rclone is written in Go and zrok in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or zrok?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (59,844 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zrok if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.