head to head · open source

rclone vs PasswordPusher

rclone has 59,961 GitHub stars, 5,440 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. PasswordPusher has 3,202 stars, 460 forks, 105 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rclone leads on adoption by 1,773% (59,961 vs 3,202 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; PasswordPusher is written in Ruby under Apache-2.0. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, PasswordPusher 14%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (encryption), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K PasswordPusher ★ 3.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone PasswordPusher
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 3.2K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Ruby
Last push 2026-09-26 2026-09-25
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 460
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick PasswordPusher if

  • You want the PasswordPusher feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and PasswordPusher fits your workflow better

full PasswordPusher profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About PasswordPusher

PasswordPusher is an Apache 2.0 licensed Ruby web application for sharing passwords, notes, files and URLs as self deleting links that expire after a set number of views or a set duration, with audit logs recording who viewed what, and when.

read the full PasswordPusher overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or PasswordPusher more popular?

rclone has 59,961 GitHub stars and PasswordPusher has 3,202. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and PasswordPusher free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and PasswordPusher under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and PasswordPusher?

rclone is written in Go and PasswordPusher in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or PasswordPusher?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (59,961 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose PasswordPusher if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.