head to head · open source

rclone vs Meteor-Files

rclone has 59,942 GitHub stars, 5,430 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Meteor-Files has 1,116 stars, 165 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. rclone leads on adoption by 5,271% (59,942 vs 1,116 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; Meteor-Files is written in JavaScript under BSD-3-Clause. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Meteor-Files 15%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (dropbox), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K Meteor-Files ★ 1.1K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone Meteor-Files
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 1.1K
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-08
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 165
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick Meteor-Files if

  • You want the Meteor-Files feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Meteor-Files fits your workflow better

full Meteor-Files profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About Meteor-Files

Meteor Files is an open source Meteor.js package, published as ostrio:files under the BSD 3 Clause licence, that adds file upload and file management to Meteor applications using the MongoDB Collection API, and it is aimed at JavaScript developers building on Meteor.js who need uploads without adopting a separate file handling API.

read the full Meteor-Files overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or Meteor-Files more popular?

rclone has 59,942 GitHub stars and Meteor-Files has 1,116. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and Meteor-Files free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and Meteor-Files under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and Meteor-Files?

rclone is written in Go and Meteor-Files in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or Meteor-Files?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (59,942 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Meteor-Files if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.