head to head · open source
rclone vs Meteor-Files
rclone has 60,878 GitHub stars, 5,664 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Meteor-Files has 1,113 stars, 165 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. rclone leads on adoption by 5,370% (60,878 vs 1,113 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; Meteor-Files is written in JavaScript under BSD-3-Clause. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Meteor-Files 15%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (dropbox), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| rclone | Meteor-Files | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 61K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Written in | Go | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-08 | 2026-10-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.7K | ⑂ 165 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick rclone if
- You weight community size — 61K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Meteor-Files if
- You want the Meteor-Files feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and Meteor-Files fits your workflow better
About rclone
Website Documentation Download Contributing Changelog Installation Forum Rclone Rclone ("rsync for cloud storage") is a command line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Storage providers 1Fichier :page facing up: Akamai Netstorage :page facing up: Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) Object Storage System (OSS) :page facing up: Amazon S3 :page facing up: ArvanCloud Object Storage (AOS) :page facing up: Bizfly Cloud Simple Storage :page facing up: Backblaze B2 :page facing up: Box :page facing up: Ceph :page facing up: China Mobile Ecloud Elastic Object Storage (EOS) :page…
read the full rclone overview →
About Meteor-Files
Files for Meteor.js Stable, fast, robust, and well maintained Meteor.js package for files management using MongoDB Collection API. Call .insertAsync() method to initiate a file upload and to insert new record into MongoDB collection after upload is complete. Calling .removeAsync() method would erase stored file and record from MongoDB Collection. And so on, no need to learn new APIs. Hackable via hooks and events. Supports uploads to AWS:S3, GridFS, Google Storage, DropBox, and other 3rd party storage. ToC: 📔 Documentation Docs, API, Demos, Examples ✨ Key features 📔 API Documentation ⚡️ Quick start : 🔧…
read the full Meteor-Files overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is rclone or Meteor-Files more popular?
rclone has 60,878 GitHub stars and Meteor-Files has 1,113. rclone has the larger community by that measure.
Are rclone and Meteor-Files free?
Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and Meteor-Files under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between rclone and Meteor-Files?
rclone is written in Go and Meteor-Files in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, rclone or Meteor-Files?
Choose rclone if you want the larger community (60,878 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Meteor-Files if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.