head to head · open source

rclone vs lf

rclone has 59,866 GitHub stars, 5,418 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. lf has 9,518 stars, 375 forks, 85 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. rclone leads on adoption by 529% (59,866 vs 9,518 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; lf is written in Go under MIT. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, lf 4%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K lf ★ 9.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone lf
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 9.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 375
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick lf if

  • You want the lf feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and lf fits your workflow better

full lf profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About lf

lf is a terminal file manager written in Go for command line users who want fast, keyboard driven browsing of the filesystem without leaving the terminal.

read the full lf overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or lf more popular?

rclone has 59,866 GitHub stars and lf has 9,518. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and lf free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and lf under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and lf?

rclone is written in Go and lf in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or lf?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (59,866 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lf if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.