head to head · open source

rclone vs hfs

rclone has 59,899 GitHub stars, 5,420 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hfs has 3,915 stars, 371 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rclone leads on adoption by 1,430% (59,899 vs 3,915 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; hfs is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, hfs 9%. hfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K hfs ★ 3.9K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone hfs
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 3.9K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 371
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick hfs if

  • You want the hfs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and hfs fits your workflow better

full hfs profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About hfs

HFS is a TypeScript web file server under the GPL 3.0 licence that turns a computer running Windows, Linux, macOS, FreeBSD or Android into a file sharing server whose folders and individual files are reachable from any browser.

read the full hfs overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or hfs more popular?

rclone has 59,899 GitHub stars and hfs has 3,915. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and hfs free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and hfs under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and hfs?

rclone is written in Go and hfs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or hfs?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (59,899 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose hfs if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.