head to head · open source

rclone vs ffsend

rclone has 59,833 GitHub stars, 5,408 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ffsend has 7,413 stars, 205 forks, 33 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. rclone leads on adoption by 707% (59,833 vs 7,413 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; ffsend is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, ffsend 3%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (encryption), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K ffsend ★ 7.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone ffsend
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 7.4K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2025-11-20
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 205
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick ffsend if

  • You want the ffsend feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and ffsend fits your workflow better

full ffsend profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About ffsend

ffsend is a command line client for the Send file sharing service that uploads and downloads encrypted files and directories through a single terminal command, built for developers, system administrators and anyone who prefers a scriptable, privacy respecting alternative to a web upload form.

read the full ffsend overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop rclone vs dufs

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or ffsend more popular?

rclone has 59,833 GitHub stars and ffsend has 7,413. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and ffsend free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and ffsend under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and ffsend?

rclone is written in Go and ffsend in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or ffsend?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (59,833 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ffsend if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.