head to head · open source

rclone vs FarManager

rclone has 60,069 GitHub stars, 5,468 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FarManager has 2,232 stars, 248 forks, 156 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rclone leads on adoption by 2,591% (60,069 vs 2,232 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; FarManager is written in C++ under BSD-3-Clause. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, FarManager 11%. FarManager was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K FarManager ★ 2.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone FarManager
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 2.2K
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Written in Go C++
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-10-02
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 248
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick FarManager if

  • You want the FarManager feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and FarManager fits your workflow better

full FarManager profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About FarManager

Far Manager is a text mode file and archive manager for Windows, built in C++ under a BSD 3 Clause licence, aimed at users and administrators who prefer a keyboard driven console interface for file operations and who want to extend the tool through plugins.

read the full FarManager overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 207K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or FarManager more popular?

rclone has 60,069 GitHub stars and FarManager has 2,232. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and FarManager free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and FarManager under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and FarManager?

rclone is written in Go and FarManager in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or FarManager?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (60,069 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose FarManager if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.