head to head · open source

ranger vs dufs

ranger has 17,405 GitHub stars, 942 forks, 896 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. dufs has 10,759 stars, 589 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. ranger leads on adoption by 62% (17,405 vs 10,759 stars). ranger is written in Python under GPL-3.0; dufs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. ranger has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, dufs 5%. ranger was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ranger ★ 17K dufs ★ 11K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ranger dufs
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 11K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python Rust
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-06-29
Forks ⑂ 942 ⑂ 589
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ranger if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ranger profile →

pick dufs if

  • You want the dufs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and dufs fits your workflow better

full dufs profile →

About ranger

Ranger is a console file manager with VI key bindings, written in Python and released under the GNU General Public License version 3, for terminal users who want to browse, preview, and manipulate files without leaving a Unix shell.

read the full ranger overview →

About dufs

Dufs is a Rust command line file server, released under the Apache 2.0 licence and distributed as dufs , that serves static files, accepts uploads, supports search and access control, and speaks WebDAV from a single binary.

read the full dufs overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

ranger vs LocalSend ranger vs rclone ranger vs copyparty ranger vs Files ranger vs yazi ranger vs Spacedrive ranger vs Nextcloud ranger vs uppy ranger vs cloudreve ranger vs superfile ranger vs Seafile ranger vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is ranger or dufs more popular?

ranger has 17,405 GitHub stars and dufs has 10,759. ranger has the larger community by that measure.

Are ranger and dufs free?

Both are open source. ranger is licensed under GPL-3.0 and dufs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ranger and dufs?

ranger is written in Python and dufs in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ranger or dufs?

Choose ranger if you want the larger community (17,405 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose dufs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.