head to head · open source

rancher vs puppetry

rancher has 25,924 GitHub stars, 3,221 forks, 3,371 open issues and last shipped yesterday. puppetry has 888 stars, 127 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. rancher leads on adoption by 2,819% (25,924 vs 888 stars). rancher is written in Go under Apache-2.0; puppetry is written in JavaScript under MIT. rancher has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, puppetry 14%. rancher was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rancher ★ 26K puppetry ★ 888 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rancher puppetry
GitHub stars ★ 26K ★ 888
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-06-19
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 127
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rancher if

  • You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rancher profile →

pick puppetry if

  • You want the puppetry feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and puppetry fits your workflow better

full puppetry profile →

About rancher

Rancher is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go based open source container management platform for organizations that deploy containers in production and need to run Kubernetes everywhere while meeting IT requirements and empowering DevOps teams.

read the full rancher overview →

About puppetry

Puppetry is a no code/low code end to end web testing tool built on top of Puppeteer and Jest, aimed at QA engineers, testers, and developers who want to record and manage browser tests through a UI instead of writing scripts — though the project is now officially deprecated and kept only as an example and a piece of its own history.

read the full puppetry overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs rancher n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

rancher vs ansible rancher vs compose rancher vs conductor rancher vs xxl-job rancher vs gitleaks rancher vs Kestra rancher vs haystack rancher vs Prefect rancher vs Archon rancher vs Temporal rancher vs rowboat rancher vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is rancher or puppetry more popular?

rancher has 25,924 GitHub stars and puppetry has 888. rancher has the larger community by that measure.

Are rancher and puppetry free?

Both are open source. rancher is licensed under Apache-2.0 and puppetry under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rancher and puppetry?

rancher is written in Go and puppetry in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rancher or puppetry?

Choose rancher if you want the larger community (25,924 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose puppetry if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.