head to head · open source

rancher vs Inngest

rancher has 25,922 GitHub stars, 3,222 forks, 3,371 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Inngest has 5,841 stars, 357 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rancher leads on adoption by 344% (25,922 vs 5,841 stars). rancher is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Inngest is written in Go under a custom or non-standard licence. rancher has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Inngest 6%. rancher was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rancher ★ 26K Inngest ★ 5.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

rancher Inngest
GitHub stars ★ 26K ★ 5.8K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 357
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rancher if

  • You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rancher profile →

pick Inngest if

  • You want the Inngest feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Inngest fits your workflow better

full Inngest profile →

About rancher

Rancher is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go based open source container management platform for organizations that deploy containers in production and need to run Kubernetes everywhere while meeting IT requirements and empowering DevOps teams.

read the full rancher overview →

About Inngest

Inngest is an open source workflow orchestration platform that lets developers write durable, event driven step functions in their existing language SDKs and run them on serverless, long running servers, or the edge.

read the full Inngest overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs rancher compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack conductor vs xxl-job compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

rancher vs compose rancher vs conductor rancher vs xxl-job rancher vs gitleaks rancher vs Kestra rancher vs haystack rancher vs Prefect rancher vs Archon rancher vs Temporal rancher vs rowboat rancher vs Trigger rancher vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is rancher or Inngest more popular?

rancher has 25,922 GitHub stars and Inngest has 5,841. rancher has the larger community by that measure.

Are rancher and Inngest free?

Both are open source. rancher is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Inngest has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between rancher and Inngest?

rancher is written in Go and Inngest in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rancher or Inngest?

Choose rancher if you want the larger community (25,922 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Inngest if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.