head to head · open source

checkov vs pwndoc

checkov has 9,015 GitHub stars, 1,415 forks, 170 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. pwndoc has 2,895 stars, 519 forks, 122 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. checkov leads on adoption by 211% (9,015 vs 2,895 stars). checkov is written in Python under Apache-2.0; pwndoc is written in JavaScript under MIT. checkov has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, pwndoc 18%. checkov was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

checkov ★ 9.0K pwndoc ★ 2.9K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

checkov pwndoc
GitHub stars ★ 9.0K ★ 2.9K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 519
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick checkov if

  • You weight community size — 9.0K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full checkov profile →

pick pwndoc if

  • You want the pwndoc feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and pwndoc fits your workflow better

full pwndoc profile →

About checkov

Checkov is an open source static code analysis and software composition analysis tool that scans infrastructure as code, container images and open source packages for security and compliance misconfigurations during the build, and it is aimed at developers, DevOps engineers and security teams who want those checks to run before anything is deployed to AWS, Azure or Google Cloud.

read the full checkov overview →

About pwndoc

PwnDoc is a JavaScript pentest reporting application released under the MIT license. It lives in the information security and penetration testing ecosystem, and it is positioned as a tool for audit work, vulnerability reporting, and compliance or risk management workflows. The project describes itself as a pentest report generator, with the stated aim of helping users spend more time testing and less time documenting by sharing data such as vulnerabilities among users.

read the full pwndoc overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs kyverno opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

checkov vs lighthouse checkov vs teleport checkov vs lynis checkov vs prowler checkov vs gs-quant checkov vs opa checkov vs Amphion checkov vs kyverno checkov vs aircrack-ng checkov vs tfsec checkov vs rundeck checkov vs agent-governance-toolkit

Frequently asked questions

Is checkov or pwndoc more popular?

checkov has 9,015 GitHub stars and pwndoc has 2,895. checkov has the larger community by that measure.

Are checkov and pwndoc free?

Both are open source. checkov is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pwndoc under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between checkov and pwndoc?

checkov is written in Python and pwndoc in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, checkov or pwndoc?

Choose checkov if you want the larger community (9,015 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pwndoc if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.