head to head · open source

checkov vs aircrack-ng

checkov has 9,015 GitHub stars, 1,415 forks, 170 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. aircrack-ng has 7,659 stars, 1,375 forks, 462 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. checkov leads on adoption by 18% (9,015 vs 7,659 stars). checkov is written in Python under Apache-2.0; aircrack-ng is written in C under GPL-2.0. checkov has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, aircrack-ng 18%. checkov was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

checkov ★ 9.0K aircrack-ng ★ 7.7K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

checkov aircrack-ng
GitHub stars ★ 9.0K ★ 7.7K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Python C
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick checkov if

  • You weight community size — 9.0K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full checkov profile →

pick aircrack-ng if

  • You want the aircrack-ng feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and aircrack-ng fits your workflow better

full aircrack-ng profile →

About checkov

Checkov is an open source static code analysis and software composition analysis tool that scans infrastructure as code, container images and open source packages for security and compliance misconfigurations during the build, and it is aimed at developers, DevOps engineers and security teams who want those checks to run before anything is deployed to AWS, Azure or Google Cloud.

read the full checkov overview →

About aircrack-ng

Aircrack ng is a GPL 2.0 licensed suite of WiFi security auditing tools written in C, intended for network auditors, penetration testers, and compliance and risk management teams who assess wireless networks on hardware they control.

read the full aircrack-ng overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs kyverno opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

checkov vs lighthouse checkov vs teleport checkov vs lynis checkov vs prowler checkov vs gs-quant checkov vs opa checkov vs Amphion checkov vs kyverno checkov vs tfsec checkov vs rundeck checkov vs agent-governance-toolkit checkov vs laravel-activitylog

Frequently asked questions

Is checkov or aircrack-ng more popular?

checkov has 9,015 GitHub stars and aircrack-ng has 7,659. checkov has the larger community by that measure.

Are checkov and aircrack-ng free?

Both are open source. checkov is licensed under Apache-2.0 and aircrack-ng under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between checkov and aircrack-ng?

checkov is written in Python and aircrack-ng in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, checkov or aircrack-ng?

Choose checkov if you want the larger community (9,015 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose aircrack-ng if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.