head to head · open source

Puter vs SAMA

Puter has 43,557 GitHub stars, 4,062 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SAMA has 158 stars, 14 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. Puter leads on adoption by 27,468% (43,557 vs 158 stars). Puter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; SAMA is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. Puter has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, SAMA 9%. Puter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Puter ★ 44K SAMA ★ 158 category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Puter SAMA
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 158
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 14
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Puter if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Puter profile →

pick SAMA if

  • You want the SAMA feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and SAMA fits your workflow better

full SAMA profile →

About Puter

Puter is an open source, self hostable internet computer that delivers a full desktop environment running directly in a web browser. It functions as a cloud based operating system, integrating file storage, applications, and developer tooling into a single cohesive platform. The project lives in the browser based desktop and cloud infrastructure ecosystem, positioning itself as a free and open alternative to proprietary cloud desktop services.

read the full Puter overview →

About SAMA

SAMA is a self hostable, GPL 3.0 chat server written in JavaScript and powered by uWebSockets.js, aimed at developers and teams who want to run their own real time messaging backend instead of adopting XMPP.

read the full SAMA overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K ProjectDiscovery ★ 31K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault puter vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade puter vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat puter vs tirreno puter vs marble mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente mattermost vs vault mattermost vs unkey vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs tracecat

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Puter vs Mattermost Puter vs Signal Puter vs Ente Puter vs Element Puter vs Fluxer Puter vs Tuta Puter vs Zen Puter vs Cinny Puter vs Stoat Puter vs Quiet Puter vs Wire Puter vs Peergos

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or SAMA more popular?

Puter has 43,557 GitHub stars and SAMA has 158. Puter has the larger community by that measure.

Are Puter and SAMA free?

Both are open source. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SAMA under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Puter and SAMA?

Puter is written in TypeScript and SAMA in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Puter or SAMA?

Choose Puter if you want the larger community (43,557 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose SAMA if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.